
Too Many People, Too Little Water
Our water supply is a closed system.
Whatever collects in the aquifer from snow melt and rains in the
spring has to last us all year. There’s a large reservoir and the
western well fields, and several small rivers (streams really), and
that’s pretty much it. About 6,000 to 8,000 private wells and 80
public ones constantly draw down the underground levels, and because
there are no outside sources, it’s these underground lakes resting
in stone or gravel beds that make it possible to live here.
How Much Is There?
You would think that there’s a simple
formula somewhere that some responsible person has drawn up that
could tell us how much and for how long. Add up the total resources
on one side, list the consumers on the other, and figure out how
many people are using how much water, per day, and you probably
could predict how long the supply will last at any point during the
year. The formula could also be used to estimate how many more
people could safely be added to the side drawing down the supply—but
that might be the problem. With a finite, annually replenished
supply, there is a number beyond which the supply will not be able
to keep up, and it’s apparently not in everyone’s best interest to
make this information public.
Last year, Preserve Ramapo began
looking for these numbers. At a public meeting in June, Donald
Distante, manager of engineering at United Water told us that his
company does indeed have those numbers, and he agreed to provide us
with them. More than half a dozen follow-up phone calls and e-mails
failed to pry the information from Mr. Distante or his company, an
international corporation that is second in the world among those
foreign nationals collecting water rights to resell to local users.
Suez, United Water’s parent, is based in France and the company’s
records are well beyond the reach of our Freedom of Information Act
requests.
There was anecdotal evidence that the
company was desperately seeking new sources of water to provide for
the uncontrolled growth in Ramapo and the County. The public meeting
at which Distante promised the numbers was about a new pipeline that
will transfer water from Lake DeForest Reservoir to the western well
fields of Ramapo that were reaching dangerously low levels at the
end of the summer. The lower levels can cause all kinds of trouble
including pressures too low for adequate firefighting and greater
risk of well contamination. Water in parts of Hillcrest, for
instance, turns brown at the end of the summer, and there is
dangerously low pressure.
Besides the new reservoir pipeline,
United Water announced its plans to open two gasoline-tainted wells,
and to dig a new deep well that would tap an aquifer already used by
many private wells. And there were the prospects that didn’t work
out like the Suffern quarry and Ambry Pond. The company was clearly
running against some kind of deadline to increase its resources.
Living on Borrowed Time
In June of this year, United Water
company reps appeared at Suffern’s meeting of the Village Board
(June 11) to try to purchase a million gallons a day from Suffern’s
water company. The State had mandated an increase in the supply by
June 16—an additional 1.4 million gallons per day to meet the
current need.
We still had no idea how close we were
to the gurgling sound of air in empty pipes, but the outward signs
did not look encouraging.
Development, especially in Ramapo, is
out of control. Consider the last two zoning changes made by
Supervisor St. Lawrence and his board. There was the sextupling of
the number of families permitted on traditional single-family lots
in Monsey, and the permission of all schools to have the automatic
right to build a dormitory building on the same site, sufficient in
size to house all the students attending the school--no variances or
reviews needed. The demand side of the equation was increasing
geometrically.
We had learned from a Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory study (Water Shortages, Development, and
Drought in Rockland County, NY) that if there were two
consecutive drought seasons in Rockland, the aquifer would never
recover. The authors of the study, Bradfield Lyon, Nicholas
Christie-Blick, and Yekaterina Gluzberg did something that United
Water and the local planning boards never do—they pointed to
overdevelopment as an obvious cause of the problem.
In an interview, Dr. Christie-Blick
told Preserve Ramapo, "[Dr.] Brad Lyon and I predict stage III
drought emergencies once every 3-5 years if there is no increase
in population. If past patterns hold up, we’re living on
borrowed time."
The problem is no more complicated than
this. Say you’re ready to embark on a hike when you discover that
you have 10 canteens but 15 scouts show up. Then 20, and then 25. At
what point do you cancel the hike? And also of interest—what’s the
liability of the troop leader who sets out without bothering to even
count the canteens and the campers?
A Measuring Stick
The door at Suez (United Water) was
barred, and the Ramapo Supervisor and his Board in all their public
announcements about future needs seemed to assume there would be no
problems at all paving over the rest of Ramapo with development.
We needed an expert, testifying in
FOILable daylight, under oath, about water and population.
Then we discovered that the documentary
evidence already existed in the record of New York’s Public Service
Commission hearings concerning United Water’s request for a rate
hike. Part of the procedure called for Dr. Daniel M. Miller’s direct
testimony before the Public Service Commission last fall, and we
could FOIL this document. Dr. Miller is in charge of water supplies
at the Rockland Board of Health.
Not too far into the questioning (page
25 of the transcript), Dr. Miller was asked whether "the margin
between demand and UWNY system supply capacity has implications for
public health and safety."
He gave a list of consequences of loss
of pressure due to decreased supply, including inadequate drinking
water and water for sanitation. Loss of pressure also "can allow
infiltration of bacteria-laden or otherwise contaminated surface
water." Firefighting would also be adversely affected.
And then there was the key question (p.
25 line 12 of the testimony):
"Q> In your professional
opinion is UWNY consistently capable of delivering an
adequate and reliable supply of water to Rockland County?"
"A> No."
The only qualification Dr. Miller
offered to his answer was that "in terms of water quality"
the supply being delivered was safe. However, he also explained, "In
terms of safety issues that can result from an inadequate supply
capacity, I would have to say that UWNY’s system-wide capabilities
are marginal, and that there may already be safety issues."
Concerning long-term implications for
the County, Dr. Miller explained, "Lack of adequate supply may soon
result in severe limitations on growth and economic development in
the County."
They put the stick in the tank and the
answer came up "No"—United Water is not capable of delivering an
adequate and reliable supply of water to Rockland County.
Now What?
In the "where do we go from here"
department, there are a couple of obvious conclusions. First of all,
there’s the lesson learned about who to ask and who to trust.
Unfortunately, those in charge of land-use planning in Ramapo have
shown little or no concern about future water needs. That’s not a
good situation, especially seen in the light of the Columbia
scientist’s "we are living on borrowed time."
And then there’s United Water. Their
reluctance to deal honestly with the problem should not be
surprising. When you consider their vested interest is embedded in a
bottom line, you can understand their lack of candor and the refusal
to warn planners. An additional caution is available in the
company’s
failure in Atlanta Georgia back in 2003 involving the largest
water privatization in the U.S. They were asked to leave by the
city.
More important, though, is the question
what can residents do to try to get some control over this downward
spiral. The simplest and most effective plan turns on a single word.
When those responsible for the catastrophic planning in Ramapo (the
Supervisor and his board) ask you for your continued support in this
fall’s election, just offer the same answer given by Dr. Miller to
the Public Service Commission—"No."
Michael Castelluccio
Preserve Ramapo
|